AbstractAim: conduct cross-sectional mapping of nursing diagnosis titles for people living with AIDS, formulated according to ICNP® with those of NANDA-I. Method: this is a cross-sectional and descriptive study using a quantitative approach. After the cross-mapping between the ICNP® and NANDA-I nursing classifications, the nursing diagnoses were classified according to the Leal criteria and the Basic Human Needs. Results: it was verified that 60% of the nursing diagnoses of ICNP® were not included in NANDA-I; of these, after applying the Leal criteria, 30% were classified as similar, 5% as more restricted, 4% as more comprehensive and for 1% no agreement was identified. Conclusion: the study becomes important for comparing the practical use of the two most used nursing classifications in the world, assisting nurses to decision-making based on scientific knowledge, as well as strengthening the state of the art of Nursing.
UNAIDS. Joint united nations programme on HIV/AIDS. Global Report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic/2016. (Online) [internet]. [Cited 2017 Out 03]. Available from: http://unaids.org.br/estatisticas/.
LEMOS LA. et al. Adherence to antiretrovirals in people coinfected with the human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem (Online) [internet]. 2016 [Cited 2017 Set 28) 24(3):. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100324.
LEAL, M. T. A CIPE® e a visibilidade da enfermagem: mitos e realidade. Lisboa: Lusociência, 2006.