Problem: Historically, the inconsistency in completing the metadata determines the rejection of more than 70% of all health publications submited. Justificative: exactly two years after the publication of the first crash course for authors and of the editorial board change in OBJN is needed the instrumentation of the authors in order to meet the new demands of scientific publication. Aim: demonstrate step-by-step stages of the correct execution of the metadata according to the rules of OBJN. Method: A descriptive study presented in the form of the short metadata course. Results: blocks images and guidelines for metadata completing. Conclusion: The establishment of the guide reduces the completion time of submission, maximizes the visibility of the material submitted and the journal and reduces the rate of rejection.
Arellano, Miguel Angel. Preservação de documentos digitais. Ci. Inf., Brasília, 33 (2) Aug. 2004 . Available from <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-19652004000200002&lng=en&nrm=iso>. access on 17 October 2011. doi: 10.1590/S0100-19652004000200002.
Rocha RF. Metadados, web semântica, categorização automática: combinando esforços humanos e computacionais para a descoberta e uso dos recursos da web. Em Questão 2004,10(1):109-121.
Cruz I. Fast course for authors: metadata for nursing research. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing [serial on the Internet]. 2009 August 1; [Cited 2011 October 17]; 8(2). Available from: http://www.objnursing.uff.br/index.php/nursing/article/view/j.1676-4285.2009.2457/525
Lima DVM. Research design: a contribution to authors. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing. [serial on the Internet]. 2011 October 17;[Cited 2011 October 17]; 9(2). Available from: http://www.objnursing.uff.br/index.php/nursing/article/view/j.1974-4285.2011.4332