Uso do ultrassom por enfermeiros(as), parteiras e enfermeiras parteiras na atenção obstétrica: protocolo de revisão de escopo
PDF (English)
PDF (English)
HTML (English)
HTML
EPUB (English)
EPUB

Palavras-chave

Nursing
Prenatal Ultrasound
Midwife Enfermagem
Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal
Parteira

PlumX Metrics

Resumo

Objetivo: mapear a literatura científica acerca de como enfermeiros(as) e/ou parteiras ou enfermeiras parteiras têm incorporado o uso da ferramenta ultrassonográfica no manejo clínico da gravidez e/ou parto, nos contextos de atenção à saúde. Método: protocolo de revisão de escopo seguindo as diretrizes do JBI e uso do checklist PRISMA-P. Etapas da estratégia de busca: (1) busca inicial no PubMed (palavras-chave e termos MeSH); (2) pesquisa em MEDLINE, LILACS, BDENF, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid Journals Full Text e Web of Science e (3) triagem da lista de referências de todas as fontes de evidências encontradas na extração. Serão incluídos estudos que abordem o uso do ultrassom durante a atenção obstétrica, nos contextos de atenção à saúde. O processo de avaliação, seleção e extração dos dados será realizado por dois pesquisadores independentes. Uma análise descritiva (análise básica de frequências e porcentagens) será conduzida. Os resultados serão apresentados de forma narrativa.

https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20246756
PDF (English)
PDF (English)
HTML (English)
HTML
EPUB (English)
EPUB

Referências

Ribeiro RMAS, Rocha NL, Souza B da S de, Brandão JC, Anjos S de JSB dos. Ultrassonografia Obstétrica como Prática Avançada de Enfermagem: Relato de Experiência. In: Anais do XXVI Enfermaio e IV SIEPS [Internet]; 2023 Maio 10-12; Fortaleza, CE. Fortaleza: Universidade Estadual do Ceará; 2023 [cited 2023 Set 15]. Available from: https://www.uece.br/eventos/enfermaio/anais/trabalhos_completos/937-22774-18042023-235751.pdf.

Shah S, Santos N, Kisa R, Maxwell OM, Mulowooza J, Walker D, et al. Efficacy of an ultrasound training program for nurse midwives to assess high-risk conditions at labor triage in rural Uganda. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0235269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235269.

Dornhofer K, Farhat A, Guan K, Parker E, Kong C, Kim D, et al. Evaluation of a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum taught by medical students for physicians, nurses, and midwives in rural Indonesia. J Clin Ultrasound. 2019;48(3):145-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22809.

Bentley S, Hexom B, Nelson BP. Evaluation of an Obstetric Ultrasound Curriculum for Midwives in Liberia. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(9):1563-8. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.14.08017.

Kozuki N, Mullany LC, Khatry SK, Ghimire RK, Paudel S, Blakemore K, et al. Accuracy of Home-Based Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Obstetric Risk Factors by Primary-Level Health Care Workers in Rural Nepal. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):604-612. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001558.

Åhman A, Edvardsson K, Fagerli TA, Darj E, Holmlund S, Small R. A much valued tool that also brings ethical dilemmas - a qualitative study of Norwegian midwives' experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2178-x.

Fagerlia TA, Mogrenb I, Adolfssonc A, Edvardssonb K, Åhmanb A, Holmlundb S, et al. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ views on appropriate obstetric sonography in Norway. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;16:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.006.

Menihan CA. Limited Sonography in Collaborative Midwifery Practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000;45(6):508-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-9523(00)00068-4.

Van den Hof MC. No. 359-Obstetric Ultrasound Biological Effects and Safety. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(5):627-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.11.023.

Abramowicz J, Brezinka C, Salvesen K, ter Haar G; Bioeffects and Safety Committee; Board of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ISUOG statement on the non-medical use of ultrasound, 2009. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:617–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6389.

Edvardsson K, Mogren I, Lalos A, Persson M, Small R. A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives’ views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0632-y.

Borborema RDB, Alves VH, Calandrini TSS, Santos MV, Caetano EC. Utilização da inovação tecnológica ultrassom na prática profissional da enfermeira obstétrica: scoping review. OSF Registries [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Set 15]. Available from: https://osf.io/k8pgx. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K8PGX.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Khalil H, Larsen P, Marnie C, et al. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth. 2022 April;20(4):953-968. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated Methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119-2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.

Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hanning RM, Leatherdale ST. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0.

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

Pollock D, Tricco AC, Peters MDJ, Mclnerney PA, Khalil H, Godfrey CM, et al. Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2022 April;20(4):1098-1105. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00570.

Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 March;21(3):520-532. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Array